Synopsis: SCANDAL
OF THE SEASON
At five-and-twenty, Venetia Lanyon despairs of ever meeting the handsome hero of her romantic dreams. Then her long-absent neighbor, Lord Damerel, returns home to Yorkshire. An infamous rake, he is the most scandalous man in all of England and he has set his amorous sights on the lovely Venetia.
Determined to woo and win the fair Venetia, Lord Damerel pursues her with a passionate abandon that is soon the talk of the town. But Venetia has no intention of losing her heart to the rakish lord until she is sure that beneath his swashbuckling ways and shocking manners lies a tender heart belonging to her.
At five-and-twenty, Venetia Lanyon despairs of ever meeting the handsome hero of her romantic dreams. Then her long-absent neighbor, Lord Damerel, returns home to Yorkshire. An infamous rake, he is the most scandalous man in all of England and he has set his amorous sights on the lovely Venetia.
Determined to woo and win the fair Venetia, Lord Damerel pursues her with a passionate abandon that is soon the talk of the town. But Venetia has no intention of losing her heart to the rakish lord until she is sure that beneath his swashbuckling ways and shocking manners lies a tender heart belonging to her.
My thoughts:
L-O-V-E I-T! Just lovely! Damerel is a veery charming and seductive scoundrel, I
must give him that! Georgette Heyer is the Mother of Historical Romance as we
know it today, for without her and the authors before her, there wouldn't be basis for Julia Quinn, Mary
Balough, Madeline Hunter and so on, in my humble opinion.
Julia Quinn and Georgette Heyer are compared to Jane
Austen, but I saw many differences between them. For an instance, Heyer and
Quinn don’t focus on the social matters and daily issues that were important to
Austen. On the other hand, Quinn gets the sexual a little bit more intense than
Heyer and OBVIOUSLY – since that during 1814 and everything after that, a
female author writing was scandalous enough, imagine writing about sexual
scenes! – Austen, but the romance is there all right. Another difference that I've noticed - although it's more of a statement - Jane Austen always had a head start because she lived in the period that Quinn or Heyer had to do their homework and research about it.
Heyer was a delight to read. It’s been a while since I
last cheered for a historical novel. As I said in late posts, there’s been a
pattern in these new books, so I’ve been finding difficulties to enjoy my
reading. But this time was different. Heyer was from the 20’s so the innocence was
still kept while reading it, but it wasn’t so bucolic as in the novels from the
nineteenth century.
Venetia is a strong headed girl that likes her independence.
Living in the same neighborhood for 25 years and never leaving because of her
recluse father, her only friends were her younger brother Aubrey, a sharp-tongued
17-years-old boy with a hip disability but a big brain; Lady Denny, a long
family friend and protector of Venetia; Edward Yardley, just a presumptuous
asshole that thought that owned Venetia;
Oswald Denny, nobody; the servants and no one else. But the arrival of Lord
Damerel shook things up, for he is known for having eloped with a married
woman. Their first meeting was… how can I say it… interesting. But I won’t say
why. ;P
Anyway, as the story goes on, you realize that the
romance isn’t the focus. Yeah, I know, I wasn’t expecting it myself. Damerel
don’t try to seduce her, don’t try to get her to his bed, don’t try to “ruin”
her virtue, nothing! They become friends, her brother becomes friends with him
too, and soon they are all in such good terms, that you forget that Lord
Damerel was in the past such a “bad person”.
After all this you think “ok, they are friends now
then they fall in love for each other and then they get together, right?”
WRONG! Damerel dismisses her! And so she goes to her aunt’s house in London, to
escape from seeing him and the new Lady Lanyon that arrives in Yorkshire, with
her mother claiming that she is married and
pregnant with Venetia’s older brother’s child.
What I liked most were the plot, obviously, and the
couple. Damerel may be a rakish, but he has good judgment to know that a relation,
especially a romantic one – their friendship was already seen with bad eyes –
would be Venetia’s doom. But she couldn’t care less! She has her mind made, she
loves her independence, and she loves him! Look at the F**** she gives for the talk
of the town.
I really liked this. I want the rest. That’s all I’ll
say in the end.
Rate:
No comments:
Post a Comment